🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.