The Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Prosperity and Hardship Now Sit Side by Side in Across England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents occupy homes just a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in nearby Scartho village. A 1.8-metre-high wall physically separates the two communities in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off roads and walkways that previously linked them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” remarked a resident, 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark Pattern Across the Country
Analysis of government statistics shows the extent of disparity can run, sometimes across nothing more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a barrier. Decades of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of councils now contain a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the nation.
This spread of deprivation has led to a sharp increase in the number of locations where disadvantaged and well-off people find themselves living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The wall transcends being just a symbolic division; it creates very real problems for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take 15-20 minutes turn into an hour-long detour.
- Reaching important services like grocery stores, educational facilities and employment centres is hindered.
- The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with instances of litter being dumped over the wall and related issues.
“People strive to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one resident, gesturing towards the corroded metal wall.
Community Spirit Amidst Hardship
At Centre4, staff stress that need transcends postcodes. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director Tracey Good.
Despite being placed in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a strong sense and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, Scartho is classified among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This phenomenon is repeated across the country. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is closely bordered by spacious detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for job prospects and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” commented a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The financial gap is clear: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side comparable properties fetch about £410,000.
Residents describe a tangible sense of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our amenities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a picture of an increasingly segregated England, where prosperity and need are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.