🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that started out as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where African descendants are remunerated to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.